‘Twas the Night Before Christmas in the Lawyer’s Offices

A variety of foot apparel, e.g. stocking, socks, etc., had been affixed by and around the chimney in said House in the hope and/or belief that St. Nick a/k/a/ St. Nicholas a/k/a/ Santa Claus (hereinafter “Claus”) would arrive at sometime thereafter.

The minor residents, i.e. the children, of the aforementioned House, were located in their individual beds and were engaged in nocturnal hallucinations, i.e. dreams, wherein vision of confectionery treats, including, but not limited to, candies, nuts and/or sugar plums, did dance, cavort and otherwise appear in said dreams.

Whereupon the party of the first part (sometimes hereinafter referred to as “I”), being the joint-owner in fee simple of the House with the parts of the second part (hereinafter “Mamma”), and said Mamma had retired for a sustained period of sleep. (At such time, the parties were clad in various forms of headgear, e.g. kerchief and cap.)

Suddenly, and without prior notice or warning, there did occur upon the unimproved real property adjacent and appurtent to said House, i.e. the lawn, a certain disruption of unknown nature, cause and/or circumstance. The party of the first part did immediately rush to a window in the House to investigate the cause of such disturbance.

At that time, the party of the first part did observe, with some degree of wonder and/or disbelief, a miniature sleigh (hereinafter the “Vehicle”) being pulled and/or drawn very rapidly through the air by approximately eight (8) reindeer. The driver of the Vehicle appeared to be and in fact was, the previously referenced Claus.

Said Claus was providing specific direction, instruction and guidance to the approximately eight (8) reindeer and specifically identified the animal co-conspirators by name: Dasher, Dancer, Prancer, Vixen, Comet, Cupid, Donder and Blitzen (hereinafter the “Deer”). (Upon information and belief, it is further asserted that an additional co-conspirator named Rudolph may have been involved.)

The party of the first part witnessed Claus, the Vehicle and the Deer intentionally and willfully trespass upon the roofs of several residences located adjacent to and in the vicinity of the House, and noted that the Vehicle was heavily laden with packages, toys and other items of unknown origin or nature. Suddenly, without prior invitation or permission, either express or implied, the Vehicle arrived at the House, and Claus entered said House via the chimney.

Said Claus was clad in a red fur suit, which was partially covered with residue from the chimney, and he carried a large sack containing a portion of the aforementioned packages, toys, and other unknown items. He was smoking what appeared to be tobacco in a small pipe in blatant violation of local ordinances and health regulations.

Claus did not speak, but immediately began to fill the stocking of the minor children, which hung adjacent to the chimney, with toys and other small gifts. (Said items did not, however, constitute “gifts” to said minor pursuant to the applicable provisions of the U.S. Tax Code.) Upon completion of such task, Claus touched the side of his nose and flew, rose and/or ascended up the chimney of the House to the roof where the Vehicle and Deer waited and/or served as “lookouts.” Claus immediately departed for an unknown destination.

However, prior to the departure of the Vehicle, Deer and Claus from said House, the party of the first part did hear Claus state and/or exclaim: “Merry Christmas to all and to all a good night!” Or words to that effect.

— Author Unknown

Advertisements

Hunger and Health Literacy

Do you believe that a child is personally responsible for going hungry over a weekend?  The thinking person would say, of course not.

  •  Did you know that when a child goes hungry over a weekend, they are not able to learn until Wednesday afternoon?
  • Did you know that children facing even moderate nutritional vulnerability are hindered in their cognitive development?
  • Did you know that hunger can:

                           … slow growth…

                           …increase illnesses, like colds and

                               infections…

                           …lower concentration and

                               alertness in school…

                            …inhibit brain development?

OK, these are the results of children going hungry over a weekend.  There are more than 17 million children in the United States at risk of hunger.

Are those children personally responsible for what is happening to them and their brains and bodies?

Children who have had this happen do not recover the lost cognitive capacity, lost health, lost school time.  Reasonable, otherwise generous, people suggest that growing up poor should not be an excuse for poor choices.

In a recent article in Time Magazine, “Child hunger is robbing us of the best of America’s imagination and ingenuity,” said the report’s author, John Cook, Ph.D., of the Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, a nationally-recognized expert on child hunger. “Sustainable economic recovery depends on freeing children of the burden of hunger and malnutrition and supporting their optimal growth and development.”

Unfortunately success and failure in the US are too often attributed to the individual.  We become so focused on individual responsibility that we forget other realities.  For example, under-nutrition before the age of three fundamentally changes the neurological architecture of the brain and central nervous system, harming a child’s ability to learn.  If the brains of children are harmed by hunger and if we want to prevent poor health choices and health behavior in adults, then we cannot let anyone grow up in socio-economically disadvantaged situations that include short rations.  That is the only way to fairly expect decision-making that is healthy.

“The impact of child hunger is more far reaching than one might anticipate. Child food insecurity creates billions of dollars in costs to our society. Child hunger affects a child’s health, education and job readiness,” said Cook. “Our best universities are graduating more students from other countries and fewer from the U.S. because we are failing to prepare our children to learn and develop their best skills, creativity and abilities.”

There are things you can do to help!  One mom saw a need in Guilford County, North Carolina and started BackPack Beginnings.  This 100% volunteer organization is trying to reduce childhood food insecurity, one child at a time.  Check out the website, Feeding America and take action!